Guwahati: Assam minister Pijush Hazarika has sparked debate with a social media post reflecting on the historical roots of Mymensingh and its long-standing cultural links with ancient Assam. He described the region as once being an integral part of ancient Kamrup, shaped by shared civilisation, culture, and history.
Hazarika’s post presents his perspective on how political decisions and social changes, over time, altered those historical connections.
What historical link does the minister highlight?
According to Hazarika, Mymensingh was never “foreign” in civilisational terms and was closely connected to ancient Assam. He wrote that indigenous communities such as the Koch, Hajong, and Bodo had settled in the region well before the advent of Islam.
He added that language, culture, dance, and social traditions historically linked Mymensingh with Assam in a natural and continuous way.
What changes does he point to?
In his post, Hazarika argued that this historical continuity was gradually disrupted. He attributed the shift to what he described as democratic changes combined with political appeasement and the rise of religious extremism.
The minister claimed these factors transformed what he called a once peaceful region into an area facing instability, in his assessment.
Why does he call it a warning?
Hazarika said the developments did not occur overnight but were the result of long-term political decisions. He referenced the Partition period and subsequent policy choices, arguing that their consequences were borne by ordinary people rather than decision-makers.
He stressed that Mymensingh is located only about 90 kilometres from the Assam border, presenting the situation as a reminder for policymakers and the public to reflect on regional security and social cohesion.
How has the post been framed?
The minister described his remarks as more than a recounting of history, calling them a warning against ignoring ground realities. He cautioned that dismissing such concerns, in his view, could allow similar situations to emerge elsewhere.
The post has drawn attention for its historical narrative and political interpretation, adding to ongoing discussions around identity, security, and regional history in Northeast India.
Conclusion
Pijush Hazarika’s comments on Mymensingh reflect a personal and political reading of history, linking past decisions to present-day challenges. While the views have generated discussion, they underscore how historical narratives continue to shape contemporary political discourse in Assam and the wider region.
